JPG vs PNG vs WebP: Welches Bildformat sollten Sie verwenden?

Choosing the right image format can significantly impact your website's performance, image quality, and user experience. In this comprehensive guide, we'll break down the three most popular web image formats: JPG, PNG, and WebP.

JPG (JPEG): Best for Photographs

JPG (Joint Photographic Experts Group) is the most widely used image format on the web, and for good reason. It uses lossy compression, which means it reduces file size by discarding some image data.

Advantages of JPG:

  • Small file sizes: Excellent compression makes JPG ideal for photos and complex images
  • Universal support: Every browser, device, and image editor supports JPG
  • Adjustable quality: You can balance quality vs file size to meet your needs
  • Perfect for photos: Handles gradients and complex color variations beautifully

Disadvantages of JPG:

  • No transparency: Cannot have transparent backgrounds
  • Lossy compression: Each save degrades quality slightly
  • Not ideal for text: Sharp edges and text can appear blurry or have artifacts

Best use cases for JPG:

  • Photography and portraits
  • Blog post hero images
  • Product photos for e-commerce
  • Social media images
  • Any image where file size matters more than pixel-perfect quality

PNG: Best for Graphics and Transparency

PNG (Portable Network Graphics) was created as an improved replacement for GIF. It uses lossless compression, preserving all image data without quality loss.

Advantages of PNG:

  • Lossless compression: No quality loss, even after multiple saves
  • Transparency support: Full alpha channel allows for smooth transparent backgrounds
  • Sharp edges: Perfect for logos, icons, and text
  • Wide color support: Supports millions of colors (PNG-24)

Disadvantages of PNG:

  • Larger file sizes: Can be 3-5x larger than equivalent JPG
  • Not ideal for photos: Photos become unnecessarily large
  • No animation support: Unlike GIF, PNG cannot contain animations (though APNG exists)

Best use cases for PNG:

  • Logos and brand assets
  • Icons and UI elements
  • Screenshots and diagrams
  • Images requiring transparency
  • Graphics with text or sharp lines
  • Images that will be edited multiple times

WebP: The Modern All-Rounder

WebP is a modern image format developed by Google that provides superior compression for both lossy and lossless images. It combines the best features of JPG and PNG while delivering smaller file sizes.

Advantages of WebP:

  • Superior compression: 25-35% smaller than JPG at the same quality
  • Transparency support: Supports alpha channel like PNG but with better compression
  • Versatility: Works well for both photos and graphics
  • Animation support: Can replace animated GIFs with much smaller files
  • Both lossy and lossless: Choose the compression type that fits your needs

Disadvantages of WebP:

  • Limited support in older browsers: Not supported in Internet Explorer and older Safari versions
  • Less familiar: Not all image editing tools support WebP yet
  • Requires fallback: Often need to provide JPG/PNG alternatives for compatibility

Best use cases for WebP:

  • Modern websites targeting performance
  • E-commerce product images
  • Any image where file size reduction is critical
  • Responsive images for mobile devices
  • High-resolution displays (Retina, 4K)

Quick Comparison Table

Feature JPG PNG WebP
Compression Lossy Lossless Both
Transparency No Yes Yes
File Size Small Large Smallest
Browser Support Universal Universal Modern browsers
Best For Photos Graphics, logos Everything (modern sites)

Making the Right Choice

Here's a simple decision tree to help you choose:

  • Use JPG if you're working with photographs or images with complex colors and gradients, and don't need transparency
  • Use PNG if you need transparency, are working with logos/icons/graphics, or need to preserve perfect quality
  • Use WebP if you're building a modern website and want the best performance, but always provide JPG/PNG fallbacks

Pro Tips

  • Always compress images before uploading to your website - even small reductions add up
  • Consider serving WebP to modern browsers with JPG/PNG fallbacks for older ones
  • Use responsive images (srcset) to serve appropriately sized images for different screen sizes
  • Convert images to the format that best suits their content type, not just one format for everything
  • Test your images on actual devices to ensure quality meets your standards

Conclusion

There's no single "best" image format - each has its strengths. JPG excels at photographs, PNG is perfect for graphics and transparency, and WebP offers the best compression for modern websites. Understanding these differences will help you make informed decisions that balance quality, file size, and compatibility for your specific needs.

Häufig gestellte Fragen

Welches ist das beste Bildformat für Websites?

WebP ist ideal für moderne Websites und bietet 25-35% bessere Kompression als JPG bei Transparenzunterstützung. Verwenden Sie JPG für Legacy-Browser und PNG für Bilder mit Transparenz.

Sollte ich PNG oder JPG für Fotos verwenden?

Verwenden Sie JPG für Fotografien, da es eine ausgezeichnete Kompression für komplexe Farbverläufe bietet. PNG ist besser für Grafiken, Logos und Bilder, die Transparenz erfordern.

Wird WebP von allen Browsern unterstützt?

WebP wird von über 95% der Browser unterstützt, einschließlich Chrome, Firefox, Edge und Safari. Bieten Sie immer JPG/PNG-Fallbacks für ältere Browser an.